Iām a sucker for WW2 novels, so I wolfed down The Nightingale by Kristin Hannah, but itās definitely not perfect. There were inconsistencies and unrealistic events (like occasionally forgetting to age characters appropriately or having a beautiful meal seasoned with lemon and garnished with fresh herbs in the middle of war-time rationed France). But I found it easy to suspend belief and enjoy the story. I donāt think this story is for anyone who wants a hyperrealistic perspective of WW2. Itās historical fiction with an emphasis on fiction. Seriously, donāt factcheck this novel or pay too much attention to the details (the author didnāt), because it will probably make you angry. It didnāt necessarily feel authentic to the time period, but as fiction, I downed this book. The prose is accessible and sufficiently flowy, but the writing isnāt particularly beautiful.
I thought the heroics of Isabella were overplayed and the hesitance of Vianne overemphasized, overly polarizing their different personalities. And it was a tad annoying at times. Isabella was too saccharinely perfect but also too inconsiderate for me, so I was more drawn to Vianneās storyline. I also thought that Isabellaās story was a type of bold heroism that is typically told in fictionalized accounts, namely in YA novels or its adjacent popular adult historical fiction, whereas Vianneās was a bit more rare. In fact, Isabella was modeled after the real person AndrĆ©e de Jongh, and I think Iād rather read a biography on her. Donāt get me wrong, I didnāt dislike Isabella or her storyline, and I think itās important to bring awareness to de Jonghās heroic actions even if itās through fictionalized Isabella, but Isabella just didnāt read as anything special in the historical fiction space. Her character never really went beyond the beautiful, impulsive girl turned hero trope (whose only weapon seemed to be her beauty, so serious eye roll there), which is a shame since she was modeled after a real person. I might have liked her character more if her sisterly relationship with Vianne was stronger and her romance not insta love.Ā
Vianneās chapters were the highlight for me, especially the ones with Captain Beck in them, since I thought he was the most nuanced character in the novel. He was a Wehrmacht officer, horrified by what his country was doing and wondering if his family at home would think him a monster once he got home, and ultimately a decent man on the wrong side of a war. I felt the chemistry between him and Vianne, and I had to confront the wrongness of it just as they did.Ā
Vianne was more realistic to me than the caricature of Isabella, and although she did annoy me at times because the author was so focused on making her the polar opposite of Isabella, Vianne is the only sister that escaped becoming a contrived extreme. I think the only thing that saved her from just being a comparator character for Isabella were the other people reliant upon her, like her children. Iām also a sucker for people whose first priority is taking care of children, so perhaps that is another reason why I enjoyed Vianneās chapters, who had to take care of her own child and then rescued multiple Jewish children in her area.Ā
The ending of the book was incredibly melodramatic, so while it made me effectively sad, it wasnāt an overflow of an emotion. While this is more of a chick flick version of history, Vianne definitely saved the book, and I read it in one or two sittings while I was craving relatively light storytelling (just to be clear, Iām calling the writing light, not the subject matter since WW2 is definitely a heavy topic). It was an engrossing read if not a technically well-written or researched one.