I made the mistake of waiting too long after I read the book to write this review, so my feelings are not entirely fresh in my mind, but I do remember I found the book very moving. I appreciated a womanās tale during a period where we donāt have many of those.
Anita Diamantās The Red Tent tells the story of Dinah, daughter of Jacob/Israel in the Bible. The biblical tale doesnāt dive into her story; sheās barely a footnote in the Bible, but Diamant spun the patriarchal tale into an almost matriarchal focus. The first half of the book focuses on Jacobās four wives and Dinahās childhood with four mothers, which was by far my favorite half. The second half follows Dinah away from Jacobās family bubble as a midwife and widow, none of which is corroborated in the Bible and is entirely original to Diamant. Speaking of, though the story originated from the Bible, I wouldnāt necessarily call this a religiously Christian book, since the wives of Jacob were mostly pagan who respected their husbandās religion if they didnāt follow it.
I enjoyed how Diamant brought biblical charactersāoften bland and a tad confusingāto life. The four mothers Leah, Rachel, Zilpah, and Bilhah are the most deeply characterized in the novel, which is why I enjoyed the first half of the novel more. It delved into the menstrual rituals of the women, the sanctity of the red tent, and the horrors and beauty of childbirth, which were all fascinating to me. A girlās first menstrual cycle was treated almost like a divine event among women, whereas now we just treat it as merely a painful nuisance.Ā
A lot of people donāt like Diamantās treatment of men in the novel, but I didnāt feel like they were flat; they just werenāt the focus. The characterization of the men was actually fairly good despite them not being the focus, particularly Jacob. A lot of people also take issue with the fact that the āholy menā in the Bible are portrayed as flawed humans in the book, which I donāt understand, because if you read the Bible, the men that were Godās chosen ones were extremely, confoundingly flawed, from Abraham to Israel to Moses to David. I actually think fleshing out and humanizing the people in the novel gave a kinder perspective on some aspects of the story than if you purely read the biblical account.Ā
What I didnāt like was the insta-love that Dinah experienced with both of her husbands. I definitely thought that was the largest flaw of the book, but the book was mainly about the bond of women, so it was more easily forgiven. There were also times where Diamant made some mistakes in perspective, since our narrator Dinah occasionally strayed into omniscience and knew some things she couldnāt have. The book was far from perfect, but Diamant is a still a good storyteller, and it was a very touching story that Iām sure Iāll read again.